Profiles -- an example
Here's an example of a article profiling a
local business personality. Note that it's got lots of quotes,
including some from the subject's friends and enemies. Also note
that it goes beyond what the subject is doing now to tell the story
of how he got there, and why he does what he does.
By GEOFF DOUGHERTY
St. Petersburg Times
She arrived at Jim Wilkes' compact, windowless law office near the
Howard Frankland Bridge dressed in church-going clothes. She had to
be in her 80s, reserved, meek even, and a formal hat covered her
gray hair.
In a soft voice that hinted of backwoods Florida, she told a
pitiful story of nursing home neglect. Her older sister, nearly 90,
had been left to rot for four months. Nobody took the time to shift
her weight on the mattress. Nobody noticed the way the skin on her
lower legs gave way to bedsores. Nobody noticed until it was too
late. Then the surgeons had to cut off both her legs.
She was dead now, and her sister, this woman with the quiet,
dignified voice, wanted Wilkes to do something about it.
She said she'd already been to another lawyer. He was sympathetic,
but told her nursing homes were practically immune from lawsuits.
Even if she won, there wouldn't be enough money to cover his
expenses, much less his fee, and there certainly wouldn't be any
money left for her.
But he suggested she try Jim Wilkes. He's a fighter, the other
lawyer said. Maybe Wilkes could make a few phone calls, at least
put a little scare into those nursing home people.
So now here she was in Wilkes' drab office, space he had chosen
solely for the price: the leasing agent offered the first eight
months rent for free.
He was making a decent living on whiplash cases, slip 'n falls and
the medical malpractice cases friends occasionally tossed his way.
Nobody made a living suing nursing homes. There was no money in
it.
Wilkes was getting ready to tell her how it was with nursing homes
when she handed him an envelope. Inside were pictures, mortuary
shots of a frail woman with bedsores you can't even imagine, the
pearly shine of bone at the bottom of the deepest ones. The worst
pictures Wilkes had ever seen.
He told the woman he would do something. He wasn't sure what, but
something.
That was 10 years ago. "Old people didn't have a lot of economic
value," he recalls.
Notice that Wilkes uses past tense: Old people
didn't have a lot of economic value. Now they do.
A suing machine
Wilkes and the sister sued the nursing home and settled the case
for the maximum value of its insurance policy.
In the decade since, Wilkes has sued hundreds of nursing homes,
continuing his full-court press even as some of them inch closer to
bankruptcy. He flies to depositions in a $5-million corporate jet,
runs offices in three states and brags that he has made enough
money to retire at 49.
With a series of multi-million-dollar verdicts, including a state
record $15.2-million this year in Tampa, Wilkes & McHugh P.A.,
has put nursing-home litigation on the map.
The state trial lawyers association runs seminars on turning
bedsores into dollars. Billboards urging nursing home residents to
call a lawyer dot the highways. One Florida underwriter receives
nearly twice as many nursing home claims now as eight years
ago.
"Nobody thought about nursing homes" before Wilkes, says J.B.
Spence, a Miami lawyer known as the Dean of Torts. "This was a
sleeping giant. But now they are wide awake. Wilkes was the
pioneer."
Nursing-home operators, as you might imagine, are not fond of Mr.
James Wilkes. They see a money-hungry ambulance chaser whose
groundless lawsuits have sent insurance premiums skyrocketing, cut
into funds for patient care and turned residents against their
caretakers.
"When do I get to call him a rotten son of a bitch," industry
spokesman Ed Towey says, offering his unsolicited comment for this
story. "Talking about him is like talking about Beelzebub, about
Satan, about the Antichrist."
Well, then.
Pre-law: a singing fool
Before Stetson Law school, Wilkes traveled the bar circuit. He sang
rock and country covers, and got some radio play with a song he
recorded, I'd Rather Be a Fool Loving You Than Smart Loving Someone
Else. He says it's a little something he came up with driving State
Road 50 between gigs in Brooksville and Orlando.
At the Brass Cage on 49th Street in St. Petersburg, somebody didn't
take to Wilkes' version of a country song. As Wilkes strummed his
guitar, the patron threw his shoe at Wilkes, who stepped from
behind the microphone and chased him out of the bar.
"I was going to hit him with the guitar," Wilkes says in the
Southern twang he developed in the Army. "It had one of those non-
breakable backs."
Wilkes had set a timetable for himself: If he wasn't successful by
the time he turned 30, he would leave music and return to college.
Years of crisscrossing the country had left him broke. Off to
school he went.
He planned to become an entertainment lawyer but instead chose work
in the courtroom, which offered as much rough-and-tumble as even
the seediest nightclub.
Mostly, though, the work was routine. Wilkes found it hard to get
enthused about suing somebody who ran a red light and caused
"injuries for which the plaintiff has sustained ongoing medical
expenses."
When that first nursing-home case walked in his door, Wilkes took
it not only because the story was so pitiful, but because he had a
score to settle.
Jim Wilkes, as we'll see later, likes to tell a story. Almost every
newspaper or TV story about him includes this one: A year or so
earlier, he had checked his grandmother into a nursing home. He
came to check on her four hours later. The bed was made, but she
wasn't in it.
"She was under the bed," Wilkes says. "Naked, in a fetal position
under the bed. I went all the way down the hall and I couldn't find
an aide."
A back-door way inside
If nursing homes acted carelessly toward the elderly, so did the
courts.
"A young plaintiff is worth more than an old plaintiff," says
Michael Trentalange, a Tampa personal-injury lawyer. "A working
plaintiff more than a non-working plaintiff. They just don't value
older people as much as they should."
In negligence cases, a person's salary helps determine damages. For
a retired person in his 80s, that figure usually is piddling. It's
worse for dead plaintiffs. The law allows only spouses and young
children to sue. Under traditional negligence law, the sister
couldn't even get into court.
It adds up to this: The negligent death of a widow whose child-
bearing years are well behind her goes unpunished.
Enter the patient's bill of rights. The Legislature passed it in
1976, following publicity about patient abuse at nursing homes. The
law lengthened the list of relatives who could sue nursing homes
and allowed the elderly to recover damages. It forced nursing homes
to pay the lawyer fees for patients who sue and win.
Until Wilkes took his first nursing-home case, that law had escaped
the notice of most lawyers.
Wilkes says he probably would have passed on the case, too, but for
the bed-sore pictures. "I thought they would be like a rash or
something," he says. "They were the most horrific photos I've ever
seen."
Wilkes plotted strategy with Tim McHugh, the other half of their
two-man operation. McHugh's brother Jim, a researcher at the firm,
tried to find some way around traditional negligence laws. He found
the patient's bill of rights.
Forcing the nursing home to settle that first case had Wilkes
thinking big. They could change their law practice, specialize in
nursing-home cases. But McHugh was the voice of reason. Who knew if
the firm would be able to repeat its victory? The law on
nursing-home negligence was unclear. What if judges arrived at new
interpretations that made it harder for plaintiffs to win? Were
there enough cases to support an entire law firm? McHugh had a lot
of questions.
For several months in 1992, Wilkes cajoled McHugh after work while
they exercised on Stairmasters at the Harbour Island Athletic
Club.
They agreed to refocus their practice, but gradually. Wilkes took
out ads in newspapers and on television, urging neglected nursing-
home residents to call.
Dozens of cases rolled in. Florida's first nursing home specialists
were in business.
Taking the chorus to court
When Wilkes rises before a jury, he comes off like he's preaching
the Gospel.
"Jim Wilkes is Martin Luther King and (the defense) is Al Gore,"
says Trentalange. "Al Gore is a good speaker. But he's a fact-
intensive, workmanlike speaker. Wilkes has the zeal of a
preacher."
The country songs Wilkes used to sing onstage at the Sand Dollar
bar in St. Petersburg told a story. They had a chorus, and they
appealed to the heart.
It's the same way in court. The tale Wilkes tells is one of
shameful neglect. It's a rare juror who can close his heart to
photos of a wasted patient. And the chorus, which Wilkes hammers
again and again, is corporate greed.
Listen to him preach about James E. Lowe Sr., whose case yielded a
$2.7-million verdict against a nursing home in Ocala three years
ago:
"You heard a lot of lawyer talk from (defense lawyer) Mr. Kelly,
telling you how tough it is, how sorry you should feel for this
company, this publicly traded, largest nursing-home corporation in
the world, this for-profit institution. How sorry you should feel
for them, how tough it is that they can't hire good people," Wilkes
said. "That's not what this is about. It's about, did they treat
him bad? Did they do bad things to him?"
"Some of the things were evil. Letting him lie there until his
feces dried to his body. Letting him lie there turning blue with no
air. That's wrong. Allowing a man like Mr. Lowe to be abused and
neglected, his wife to be fooled, the state lied to, and all paid
for in the name of the State of Florida . . . that's heinous."
The recent $15.2-million Tampa victory was classic Wilkes &
McHugh: While some lawyers might have dwelled on their client's
medical condition, the firm put the spotlight on the nursing home
administrator. They demonized him as an evil agent of corporate
greed, who cared less about the patients than about improving the
nursing home's bottom line so his corporate bosses could sell the
facility at maximum profit.
The administrator, Wilkes says, "wanted to make a lot of money
while the residents couldn't even get toilet paper."
In his western-style suit and cowboy boots, Wilkes cuts the figure
of a front-man. Behind him is the band: 21 lawyers, seven nurses
and an army of roadies to fetch lunch and carry documents. In this
war, he recently benefited from a sweet defection: The chief
litigator for nursing home giant Beverly Enterprises Inc. switched
sides and joined Wilkes' firm. Also coming aboard last year, one of
Tampa's best-known criminal defense lawyers, Bennie Lazzara Jr. It
was Lazzara who made the closing argument in the $15.2-million
case.
Wilkes talks to governors about nursing home abuse. He donates a
healthy chunk of his winnings to political candidates, Republicans
and Democrats alike, hoping to keep them from tinkering with the
patients' bill of rights.
He commissioned a statistical analysis to document the number of
nursing-home employees who have criminal records. He hired a
pollster to conduct focus groups to help him learn which arguments
work best on jurors.
He is no slouch at selling himself. He hired a Tallahassee P.R.
firm to boost his image. Newsweek rang him up for a story on the
rising tide of nursing-home litigation. He invited a camera crew
from 48 Hours for a ride on his jet. When a reporter contacted him
for this story, Wilkes offered to fly back to Tampa from vacation
on Boothbay Harbor in Maine for an interview and photo shoot. His
wife put a stop to that.
The former mobile-home salesman, used-car salesman and home-
appliance salesman describes himself as one of the few people in
the country dedicated to working full time for the rights of
nursing home residents.
Government regulators? Too lax.
The AARP? "They're great at giving out motel discounts."
"If I didn't lobby for nursing home residents, who would? There is
nobody there."
He likes his niche. His clients get justice, he gets to crusade for
a worthy case, and he makes a bundle of money.
Great digs, tough seminar
About five-dozen nursing home executives gathered recently in a
crystal-chandeliered ballroom at the Boca Raton Resort & Club.
They passed up an afternoon in the gourmet restaurant or out on
either of the championship golf courses to spend four hours in
legal hell with Karen Goldsmith, a lawyer for the nursing-home
association.
On an overhead projector, Goldsmith posed situations a nursing-
home administrator might face.
Q: What if relatives want side-rails on the resident's bed, but the
patient doesn't meet the standard that would allow such
restraints?
A: You will probably be sued.
Q: What if you tell a hospital you don't have enough staff to take
care of a particularly complex new admission?
A: You will probably be sued.
Q: What if a patient becomes overweight but says eating is the only
reason she wants to live?
A: You will probably be sued.
The man nursing home operators blame for all this suing? Jim
Wilkes.
"I think every CEO in America is familiar with him and his ability
to create a presence and focus on malpractice in nursing homes,"
says Stephen Guillard, president of Harborside Healthcare, which
runs nine homes in Florida.
Since Wilkes won that first case, Guillard says, the ensuing
litigation has driven insurance rates for some Florida nursing
homes to nearly 10 times the national average.
Tom Kelly, a regional director for Genesis Eldercare, worries that
relatives of patients receive most of their information about
nursing homes from the wrong place, from TV ads that lawyers like
Wilkes produce to drum up business.
Those ads, and news reports about nursing home lawsuits, discourage
workers from applying at nursing homes and dishearten those who
work there. The industry already has problems recruiting nursing
assistants because of the back-breaking work and low pay.
"The public image doesn't help," Kelly says. "My staff gets very
depressed when they see the attitude toward nursing homes."
The administrators and their lawyers say that in a fair legal
system, Wilkes wouldn't be winning - or even filing - most of the
lawsuits.
They say the state's nursing home laws leave operators vulnerable
to cases that cannot even be filed against hospitals and doctors.
With public perception the way it is, the lawsuit-as-morality-play
that Wilkes perfected almost guarantees a jury will rule against
the nursing home.
"There is a fear that, my God, this could go to a jury," says
Guillard. "They take a situation that is not caused by poor care.
They get the pictures. They set all the facts aside and drive the
emotional side. It's an easy win."
That fear prompts nursing homes to settle even frivolous
lawsuits.
"Jim Wilkes will walk in and say: 'Give us $200,000 or we go to
trial,' " Kelly says. "It is legalized extortion."
Kelly dreams of a day when nursing homes are treated like other
health-care providers, no better, no worse. But he thinks Wilkes
and other plaintiff's lawyers won't let that happen.
"They don't want to level the playing field," Kelly says. "Ask Jim
Wilkes what happens to his beautiful jet planes if that
happens.
But even Guillard acknowledges that Wilkes' lawsuits have prompted
improvements in the industry. The court cases force nursing-home
operators to focus on their weaknesses and eliminate them - or pay
for them.
Ruben King-Shaw, the state's chief nursing home regulator,
considers the verdicts just. If nursing homes never failed their
patients, Jim Wilkes and others like him wouldn't be in
business.
"A judge or a jury has to find somebody negligent," King-Shaw says.
"I don't think you can blame attorneys for those rulings."
Selling appliances, selling juries
Jim Wilkes' office has windows now. From a shining glass tower high
above Dale Mabry Highway, he holds forth. This time it's on how to
sell washing machines.
"Now, I could sell a washing machine," he says. "Boy I could sell a
washing machine. I used to sell them with the super surgilator
agitator. I'd take the agitator out and throw it on the ground for
them people. Indestructible."
In his voice you can hear the pitchman's flexible intellect, ready
to expound on why Toyotas are the best until he finds himself
working the Chevy lot.
The law is not so different: The pitch comes first, honed in three
years of school and then adapted to suit the needs of whichever
client pays the bills.
Wilkes cheerfully acknowledges that selling a jury is only a few
steps away from hawking the super surgilator agitator. But he says
this is one product that he truly can believe in.
He calls nursing-home operators "self-serving and
self-promoting."
"They see nursing home residents as things to be exploited rather
than people to be cherished."
Wilkes' daughter, listening to him chatter during a recent photo
shoot, whispers: "He looks like Clinton."
He doesn't so much look like Clinton as evoke him - the glibness,
the down-home talk, the sense that even he doesn't always believe
every word he's saying.
It is on this battleground that Wilkes' critics hit their stride.
They say the man talks a good game but values cash more than his
clients.
Motivation aside, the man is a force to be reckoned with. Wilkes
says his firm has 600 pending cases, and that he has tuned his
lawsuit machine to such perfection that he can stamp out
multimillion-dollar verdicts one after another. He's moved on from
filing cases for one resident at a time.
A $100-million class-action suit he brought two years ago against
York Hannover Nursing Centers and National Healthcare is working
its way through the courts. The lawsuit alleges the companies
failed to provide the level of care specified in agreements with
thousands of residents.
In Tampa, he sued to halt the forced relocation of dozens of
Medicaid patients at a nursing home owned by Vencor Inc.
But as insurance rates spiral and nursing home profits plummet,
some wonder if Wilkes' gravy train may run dry.
York Hannover, which owns six Florida homes, recently sought
protection in bankruptcy court. And last month, Wilkes agreed to
settle the patient-dumping lawsuit against Vencor because he says
he's afraid a large verdict would bankrupt the company.
Other operators are on similar footing.
"I've heard many of them say they are one lawsuit away from closing
the facility," says Towey, the trade group spokesman.
Of course, that would leave Wilkes with no nursing homes to
sue.
"I have actually been told that by nursing-home people," he says.
"They tell me to lay back, don't be so vocal, don't kill the golden
goose. Just make money off it."
Wilkes likes to say the world would be a better place without
nursing homes, so the idea of widespread closings doesn't worry
him. His practice would thrive. He would find something else to
sell.
"I've got a meeting this week on lead-paint litigation," he
says.
You can almost hear another chorus in the works.